The Skeptic and the Dogmatist
نویسنده
چکیده
Consider the skeptic about the external world. Let’s straightaway concede to such a skeptic that perception gives us no conclusive or certain knowledge about our surroundings. Our perceptual justification for beliefs about our surroundings is always defeasible—there are always possible improvements in our epistemic state which would no longer support those beliefs. Let’s also concede to the skeptic that it’s metaphysically possible for us to have all the experiences we’re now having while all those experiences are false. Some philosophers dispute this, but I do not. The skeptic I want to consider goes beyond these familiar points to the much more radical conclusion that our perceptual experiences can’t give us any knowledge or even justification for believing that our surroundings are one way rather than another. One might go about grappling with such a skeptic in two different ways. The ambitious anti-skeptical project is to refute the skeptic on his own terms, that is, to establish that we can justifiably believe and know such things as that there is a hand, using only premises that the skeptic allows us to use. The prospects for this ambitious anti-skeptical project seem somewhat dim. The modest anti-skeptical project is to establish to our satisfaction that we can justifiably believe and know such things as that there is a hand, without contradicting obvious facts about perception. This is not easy to do, for the skeptic can present us with arguments from premises we find intuitively acceptable to the conclusion that we cannot justifiably believe or know such things. So we have a problem: premises we find plausible seem to support a conclusion we find unacceptable. The modest anti-skeptical project attempts to diagnose and defuse those skeptical arguments; to show how to retain as many of our pretheoretical beliefs about perception as possible, without accepting the premises the skeptic needs for his argument. Since this modest anti-skeptical project just NOÛS 34:4 ~2000! 517–549
منابع مشابه
Occam’s Razor, Dogmatism, Skepticism, and Skeptical Dogmatism
Underdetermination arguments for skepticism maintain that our common sense view of the external world is no better, evidentially speaking, than some skeptical competitors. An important and well-known response by dogmatists, those who believe our commonsense view is justified, appeals to abduction or inference to the best explanation. The predominant version of this strategy, going back at least...
متن کاملIntuitionistc probability and the Bayesian objection to dogmatism
Given a few assumptions, the probability of a conjunction is raised, and the probability of its negation is lowered, by conditionalising upon one of the conjuncts. This simple result appears to bring Bayesian confirmation theory into tension with the prominent dogmatist view of perceptual justification – a tension often portrayed as a kind of ‘Bayesian objection’ to dogmatism. In a recent paper...
متن کاملThe Role of a Skeptic Agent in Testing and Benchmarking of SAT Algorithms
This paper introduces a persistent agent called a skeptic who supplies instances from well-defined equivalence classes to test and benchmark SAT solvers. On such classes, metrics such as max/min ratio of timeto-solve should approach the value of 1.0. Experiments suggested by the skeptic on instances from the same class show (1) the time-to-solve max/min ratios for a given solver can exhibit a r...
متن کاملMATHEMATICAL ENGINEERING TECHNICAL REPORTS The Law of the Iterated Logarithm in Game-Theoretic Probability with Quadratic and Stronger Hedges
We prove both the validity and the sharpness of the law of the iterated logarithm in game-theoretic probability with quadratic and stronger hedges. 1 Background and the main result The law of the iterated logarithm (LIL) in game-theoretic probability was studied in Shafer and Vovk [8] under two protocols. The first protocol “unbounded forecasting” only contains a quadratic hedge. Unbounded Fore...
متن کاملImplications of contrarian and one-sided strategies for the fair-coin game
We derive some results on contrarian and one-sided strategies by Skeptic for the fair-coin game in the framework of the game-theoretic probability of Shafer and Vovk [8]. In particular, concerning the rate of convergence of the strong law of large numbers (SLLN), we prove that Skeptic can force that the convergence has to be slower than or equal to O(n−1/2). This is achieved by a very simple co...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1997